Why Social Media is bad for Blogging

Don’t get me wrong – social media is great for promoting blog posts. And given how many posts are written about social media these days, there wouldn’t be much to write about without Facebook and Twitter and G+ and everyone’s ideas of what constitutes “important” with all these sites.

The problem is with there being so many ways to share something simply, a blogger can loose steam. If every interesting thought you have is pushed out in less than 140 characters, you aren’t going to put in the work to spell it out in a full post.

The same is true of personal blogs. Why write out 300 words of why your day is going great if you can just make a quick quip, and attach a funny picture you found?

As I see it, part of the problem is everyone feels a responsibility to be entertaining. It’s high school all over again, where we want to be popular by posting the kind of things that get reshared and retweeted and get us more followers.

I’ve definitely fallen into this trap – especially now that Google Plus is on the scene. That is the point of social media, of course. It isn’t for broadcasting long ideas, but socializing. If you’re using all of your best ideas just socializing, though, you don’t have anything left to blog about.

So if you’re trying to blog, cut down on the fun time with friends and research a topic, or share an opinion with explanations of why you’re right.

That’s what I’m going to start doing anyway.

Responding to Negative Blog Posts

I have a secret to let you in on: I am not very charming.

I’m cynical, which to some sounds pessimistic – though to me it’s just critical thinking at work. At times it comes out sounding harsher than it should, which often bothers me, because I have such distaste for people who slag others and then defend themselves with a weak, “I’m just telling it like it is.” So when I get feedback about posts that come from this, I take it fairly seriously.

Last week I wrote a review of, a site that, I feel, has great potential, but has not realized it yet. I laid out some of my observations about why I felt the site was not as big as it could be – and most of those observations were negative.

I received responses from two of the people at 12seconds, and I think they exemplify how one should react to a negative post when it is about their company. If you find that someone is talking about your product or company in a similar manner, you could learn a lot from how they reacted.

The short version: Listen to what others are saying about you, respond to negative press quickly and personably, and be open to hearing from anyone who might read it later on. This is what 12seconds did, and I applaud them for it.

First, they found the post about themselves. This is a great example of the power of listening to social media. Anyone at any time of day could be talking about your company. How would you find out about it? Would you wait until someone told you their kid, who’s big on all this Internet stuff, found an article about you saying you rip people off, or make faulty products, or worse?

That could be weeks too late. In the meantime thousands of people could have come across that post and made permanent decisions about you. For example, I am a huge fan of the Fresh and Easy stores. I told my Mother about them, but she had read a negative review about them and decided to stay away. With her help I found the review, and it was a blog post that was three years old, and actually about their British parent company, Tesco. Despite all of the other positive press they may have gotten in that time, this one post made her mind up for her.

Second, getting back to 12seconds, neither response was an angry retort. Instead they were eager to share with me their differing opinions, and more importantly correct me where I was wrong. (Where I had said it wasn’t possible to embed their video, it turned out it simply didn’t work well with WordPress.) As a result I did append the post.

If someone blogged about your company and said something that wasn’t just negative but wrong, do you think you would get the same response by posting an angry comment on their blog? In most cases venting on the author will only make matters worse. They could keep your comment from getting posted at all, or worse, they could get their cockles up and just spew back at you. Then you’d be in a flame war with someone who’s only important because they created a blog account.

Also it leaves a far worse impression of your company to slam people than it does to calmly correct them when they misstep, and respectfully disagree with their differing opinions. Remember, when you print something on the Internet, it can last a good long time. While it may feel satisfying to lash out at a critic, doing so could follow you and your company indefinitely.

Finally, both responses posted an e-mail address where I – or anyone who reads the post – can get in touch with them directly. Rather than simply offer their side of the story, they went that further step to offer their time to anyone with similar comments or complaints.

Certainly responding to negative blog comments is important to show your side of the story. Asking people to contact you directly shows you are equally interested in helping people have the best experience possible with your product. The people at 12seconds did not need to offer this to me or the people who found (and will find) that post. I definitely commend them for their openness.

So always listen for mentions of your brand, and be ready to react when you find something negative or incorrect.

When you do, remember that you are not going to battle. Your job is not to change the author’s mind, but to get your side of the story out. Most bloggers are reasonable people and will be more than willing to let you respond to their readers. Posts like that can be turned into opportunities for you, if you play it right.